• Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to content
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • Subscription
  • The Magazine
  • Podcast
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Circuit Magazine

For Security & Protection Specialists

School shootings are both a political hot potato and a concern that directly affects those of us in the security industry. 

After every such event, the blame begins. Some blame the National Rifle Association (NRA), gun owners in general, and Donald Trump in particular, and call for banning firearms, or at least banning AR-15-type rifles.  Others blame video games, violent movies, the culture, or the Kardashians.  And the political games continue.

As security professionals, we must not allow ourselves to be caught up in either the politics or the hysteria of these debates. Our approach must reflect what we have been trained to do: dispassionately apply sound security principles to this security threat.

First, we must look at school shootings in terms of risk and threat analysis, as we would with any other potential threat. And from this perspective, we immediately realize that the risks of a school shooting at any public school in America, despite the media hype, is incredibly low.

Radley Balko, writing for the Washington Post, notes that out of 55 million public and private school students, fewer than 50 people per year have been killed on public school campuses over the past three years; that includes mass shootings as well as what he calls “conventional homicides.”  In other words, the odds of a child being killed in a mass shooting at an American K-12 school are less than 1 in one million.  The odds of being struck by lightning are only 1 in 700,000.

Balko goes on to note that school shootings, although taking up massive amounts of the news cycle, actually are quite rare occurrences.  He points out that “the average elementary, middle or high school can expect to see a mass shooting every 150,000 years.”

If I were protecting a principal and my threat and risk matrix showed me these odds, I would invest my time and money protecting said principal from other, more likely risks.

However, we can agree that despite the incredibly low risk, even one school shooting is too many, and we should do all within our power to safeguard our vulnerable students from these highly unlikely occurrences.


Thus, how do we mitigate this risk?

This is where the controversy arises, and where emotion begins to muscle in on logic and reason. The least logical and most promoted solution to this problem is to ban firearms in general or at least to ban the AR-15 and other semi-automatic rifles.

There is simply no objective evidence to support this argument. The only apparent reasoning behind such a ban appears to be the belief that somehow the very existence of these firearms inspires people to become mass shooters.

Simple common sense denies this. As security professionals, we know that inanimate objects do not inspire violence.  Rather, those intent on perpetrating violence use inanimate objects to achieve their ends.  A weapon is a tool—a “force multiplier,” to use a term common to our industry.  That force multiplier can be used by those intending to do good or those intent to do evil.

The AR-15 semi-automatic platform is often the weapon of choice for school shooters, but, perhaps surprisingly to those who believe that banning the platform will somehow bring an end to school shootings, it is not even the most popular firearm used.

An exhaustive study of school shootings from 1982 to 2017 showed that the most common weapons used were semi-automatic handguns, which were used nearly twice as often (in 67 incidents) as any kind of rifle (35 incidents).  Shotguns were used in 23 incidents, and revolvers in 18 incidents.

Consider the following:

  • Adam Lanza, the Sandy Hook shooter, used an AR-15 rifle, but also carried two semi-automatic handguns and a semi-automatic, 12-gauge shotgun.
  • Klebold and Harris, the Columbine shooters, used a TEC-DC9, a Hi-Point 995 carbine, several sawed-off shotguns, explosives, and knives.
  • Cho Seung-Hu, the Virginia Tech shooter, used two pistols to kill 30 students.
  • Chris Harper-Mercer, the Umpqua Community College Shooter, was carrying five handguns in addition to his semi-automatic rifle.
  • How can anybody argue that banning the AR-15 will lead to an end of school shootings?

The other roadblock to this mitigation strategy is the Second Amendment.  Two recent Supreme Court cases have upheld Americans’ right to individually keep and bear arms—specifically, those types of arms most commonly in use.  Semi-automatic handguns and AR-15 style rifles are some of the most popular weapons purchased today.  Legally it would be next to impossible to ban any of the firearms commonly used in school shootings.

We can talk all day about the merits of the Second Amendment or these recent Supreme Court cases, but this does not mitigate this risk. So let’s be objective and ask ourselves, what realistic options do we have?

If you work in close protection or in facilities security, you know the answer: we cannot guarantee that those with evil intent will be unable to acquire the tools to turn that intent into action, so we must make our schools into hard targets.  Schools are the softest targets imaginable.  They are filled with young, largely defenseless children.  They are often in “gun-free zones,” (which means that the shooter will be the only armed person in the vicinity until the police arrive).  There are often numerous unguarded entry points.

So how do we make our schools hard targets?  The answer to this question will be unique to each school, but three obvious answers spring to mind:

1) Hardened facilities: access control is an obvious step.  Due to fire codes, schools cannot do what many courthouses do and funnel all ingress and egress to one location, but they can funnel all entry to one location while providing emergency doors at other locations throughout the school.  Buzzer entries and other access control techniques can all be implemented to control access to schools, just as we control access to other vulnerable places.

2) School resource officers: many schools already employ these resource officers (a euphemism for armed police), and even though many civil rights campaigners argue that putting such officers on school grounds often ends up turning children into criminals, the fact is that several of these resource officers have already stopped mass shootings.

  • At Great Mills High School in Maryland, a resource officer stopped Austin Wyatt Rollins after he shot and wounded two students.
  • At Dixon High School in Illinois, officer Mark Dallas stopped and arrested potential shooter Matthew Milby (who, by the way, was carrying only a handgun) before he was able to injure or kill anybody.
  • At Sullivan High School in Blountville, Tennessee, Sheriff’s Deputy Carolyn Gudger confronted and stopped Thomas Richard Cowan (who was carrying two handguns) until other officers arrived and shot him.
  • At Forest High School in Ocala, Florida, Marion County Sheriff’s Deputy James Long sopped and arrested Sky Bouche, a former Forest High School student. Ironically, the incident happened on April 20th of this year, the same day that a nationwide walkout was planned to protest “gun violence.”

3) Armed faculty and staff: Many in security make obvious our arrogance when we recoil at the thought of allowing teachers to arm themselves as if only we in the industry have the dexterity and presence of mind to be trusted with such things.  This is a false assumption.

Hundreds of schools nationwide already allow properly trained faculty and staff to be armed (172 school districts in Texas alone allow this). According to the Crime Prevention Research Center, there has not been one case where a teacher has been disarmed while carrying, and there have been just seven cases of accidental discharges—six of those were on
college campuses, while only one was in a public elementary school, where a teacher’s firearm discharged accidentally in
a bathroom.

These are just three obvious mitigations that could be implemented, and in fact are being implemented right now, to mitigate the threat of mass school shootings. It is not my intention to provide all the answers needed to stop such shootings; no single essay from one professional point of view could hope to do that. But it is intended to remind those in the security industry to look at this threat as we do all others: objectively and professionally, using risk and threat analysis, and incorporating workable, pragmatic mitigation strategies, rather than wasting our time playing political games and calling for gun control.

 


What to Do About School Shootings?
By: Michael Jensen, CSMP, PPS

 

Tweet
Share
Pin
Share12
12 Shares

Buy The Latest Issue

Sign Up For News and Updates

We respect your privacy and will not share your information with anyone.
We will only message you when we have something relevant and of value to share with you.

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Bob Shepherd

    March 7, 2020 at 7:33 PM

    This is an extremely important subject, and thank you for your professional analysis. In my view, every school and college in the USA is vulnerable to a shooting no matter what hardened security or armed staff you put in it. Why? Because while America is awash with firearms and the shooter is predominantly a student of the school/college, you cannot keep them out. With that, every individual on campus requires a plan. That plan should be a proven (worldwide over decades) options based immediate action drill…Run, Hide, Fight. The individuals caught on campus, and in particular the ones caught out on the same floor space as the shooter, are the first responders. As the “professional responders” can be minutes away at least. It takes no time at all to kill and wound a number of people…seconds. In at least 3 major mass shootings last year, the first wave of professional responders were killed or wounded, thus slowing down the second wave. This is why most shootings are taken care of by the on campus individuals, staff or students alike. Remember, if there are no guns there are no shootings…it would have to then be a stabbing, throwing of acid, punch up, or verbal abuse…all of which is not good, but better than a mass shooting. As there will always be guns in America, and in particular semi automatics, I would like to see everyone learn the Run Hide Fight options based drills. Thank you.

    Reply
  2. Gregory Nunn

    March 25, 2020 at 4:03 AM

    The average livestock farmer has better predator control and defense than most public schools.
    It’s called a fence and a gate.
    Many companies have had card access doors and gates for more than thirty years, prior to 9-11 and most other “we’ve got to do something” named events.
    People (employees) are expensive, machinery (security fixtures) are cheap. We don’t need mall cops, just a very few professionals, low profile, with proper access management tools.
    Every employee, every student has an id. Wear it, rfid it per class schedules, open/close times, meals, etc.
    Access management is the key, and it doesn’t have to look prison-like, interfere with fire safety, or anything else.
    Many businesses that I have run, including pre and post 9-11 aviation businesses, successfully operate this way. Legally, safely, without creating an environment of fear and remaining an open and welcoming environment.
    We too easily get sidetracked into non-issues and politics.
    Keep it simple.
    If they can’t get in, well…..they can’t get in.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Latest Issue

Circuit Magazine - Issue 66 - AI Armageddon

Issue 66

Buy Now

Latest Newsletter

Newsletter Sign Up

What you don't know CAN hurt you!

SUBSCRIBE

Latest Industry News

Ugandan Minister Killed by Bodyguard in Apparent Wage Dispute

A Ugandan government minister, Charles Engola, was shot and killed by his bodyguard early Tuesday in an apparent private dispute over wages, according to the army and local media. Engola, a retired army colonel, served as the junior minister in charge of labor in President Yoweri Museveni’s government.

Event

News - Circuit Magazine

Zelenskiy Denies Ukraine’s Involvement in Alleged Kremlin Drone Attack

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy has refuted Russia’s claims that Ukraine was involved in a drone attack on the Kremlin, which was allegedly aimed at killing Russian President Vladimir Putin. Zelenskiy stated that Ukraine fights and defends its territory, not attacking Putin or Moscow. The Kremlin reported that two drones were used in the attack but were disabled by Russian defenses.

News taken from Issue 65 of the Circuit Magazine

Bodyguard Saves Japanese PM from Pipe Bomb Attack

A bodyguard has been hailed as a hero for his quick-thinking actions during a suspected pipe-bomb attack on Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida. Video footage captured the bodyguard kicking away a metal object as it landed near Kishida
before positioning himself between the Prime Minister and the device, shielding him with a collapsible, handheld ballistics shield.

News from Issue 65 of the Circuit Magazine

AlertEnterprise Reveals First-Ever Guardian AI Chatbot Powered by OpenAI ChatGPT

AlertEnterprise has unveiled its first-ever Guardian AI Chatbot powered by OpenAI ChatGPT. The chatbot will make its global debut at the ASIS Europe and ISC West trade events. Built on OpenAI’s GPT-3 platform, the Guardian AI Chatbot aims to provide security operators with instant access to critical physical access and security insights through quick questions and prompts.

Executive Protection/Secured Transportation Profession

COVID-19 and the Executive Protection

As practitioners, our responsibilities are many: protection of the client from physical harm, protection of the client from self-embarrassment, etc. Now, that the restrictions in the post COVID-19 era are starting to be lifted in some areas, Clients, and other high-net-worth individuals will be more aware of the area in which they are located, lodging, and traveling to.

James Bore's Cyber Security

Ways to See the Threat Before it Happens

Threat modelling is widely in use, whether knowingly or not, across every walk of life – and has been used since time immemorial to prioritise security defences. The only difference between the well-known risk assessments carried out by everyone and threat modelling in cyber security is the attempt to document and systemise it. I am hoping that this idea of formal threat modelling will be a useful tool for you to use in your future arsenal of available resources as a CP operator.

Close Protection advice

Keeping Your Edge: Building a Solid Foundation

Longevity, consistency and remaining relevant are some primary goals of all protectors. These factors are important when establishing a new contract and providing services for a new client. But what is equally important is the mindset that goes into those first days and weeks on the assignment. As such, I wanted to get the personal perspective of Vantrell Wilson, a close protection agent who I have trained with and worked alongside of for years now.

Global Risk Updates

Global Situation Report - November 2021

Global Situation Report – November 2021

Each issue our global geopolitical partner, Stratfor, provides an in-depth analysis of global incidents via in-house experts, cutting edge technology and through a comprehensive globally sourced network. Here is your summary from the last 30 days.

Popular Tags

armed attack Bodyguard business Celebrity client clients Close Protection Communication cp Crime Elijah Shaw EP Executive Executive Protection firearm firearms government gun Intelligence Law Enforcement Media Medical military News online police Prevention professional protect protection Risk Safety Security SIA Social Media Surveillance Technology terror Terrorism terrorist Threat Training VIP weapon

On The Frontline

Operating in Mexico – The Uncomfortable Truth

There are many misconceptions about close protection and private security operations in Mexico. As usual, most of the myths originate from Hollywood movies and fictional T.V. dramas. The realities of working as a bodyguard in Mexico are quite different, it’s definitely a lot more dangerous and a lot less glamorous than Hollywood would have you believe.

William Shakespeare

Executive Protection 2.1

William Shakespeare said, “Defer no time, Delays have dangerous ends”. What we do now in these trying times, we will either profit from or suffer from. Why is it that some survive these times in our industry, and some do not? What steps can be taken to avoid a crisis in your employment status?

Global Bulletproof Vests Market

Europe To Fuel Global Bulletproof Vests Market Outlook Through 2026

An upsurge in the body armor demand across the world is likely to fuel the global bulletproof vests market expansion in the near future. In recent times, there have been numerous public protests worldwide due to religious, racial, or political differences, which is increasing the demand for safety components. Rising need for protection for the police and numerous law enforcement personnel will majorly increase the use of bulletproof vests.

Follow us

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

From The Archives

Addiction.  Mental Illness.  What comes to mind when you hear those words? 

Mental Illness and Addiction: Why Should You Care?

Addiction.  Mental Illness.  What comes to mind when you hear those words? According to the …

Continue Reading about Mental Illness and Addiction: Why Should You Care?

Mental Body Armour – Have you got your Kit on?

  You wouldn’t dream of going on a job without appropriate physical protection and risk …

Continue Reading about Mental Body Armour – Have you got your Kit on?

Training, Why Is It So Important?

Training is a familiar concept and one that should be embraced by all security professionals. …

Continue Reading about Training, Why Is It So Important?

Starting Out

After a hard training session, I was having a well earned pint of Guinness with my Jujitsu …

Continue Reading about Starting Out

Promoted Event

International Security Expo

Latest Podcast Episode

Latest Issue

Circuit Magazine - Issue 66 - AI Armageddon

Issue 66

As AI armageddon comes closer, the global challenge is discerning the line between innovation and oversight, particularly concerning decision-making biases and security implications.

Buy Now

Follow us

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Home
  • Subscription
  • The Magazine
  • Podcast
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

© 2023 Circuit Magazine · Rainmaker Platform

This website or its third-party tools use cookies which are necessary to its functioning and required to improve your experience. By clicking the consent button, you agree to allow the site to use, collect and/or store cookies.
I accept