• Home
  • Categories
    • Protection
    • Hostile Environment
    • Industry News
    • Intel
    • Career Advice
    • Surveillance
    • Cybersecurity
    • Maritime
    • Risk Management
    • Fitness
    • Medical
    • Training
    • Equipment
    • Reviews
  • Daily Briefing
  • Subscription
  • The Magazine
  • Podcast
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Circuit Magazine

For Security & Protection Specialists

Get free circuit subscription with BBA membership
You are here: Home / Protection / Freedom or Security?

Freedom or Security?

Thirty years after Benjamin Franklin wrote: “They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety, Thomas Paine wrote a letter to Thomas Jefferson explaining his view of natural and civil rights.

According to Paine, if twenty persons, all strangers to each other, found themselves in a previously uninhabited country, each individual’s will was his natural right. He had the freedom and liberty to do as he pleased, even invading the sovereignty of his neighbours. It would then occur to each sovereign individual that if he united with his neighbour for mutual protection he would increase his personal security. But to do that he would have to sacrifice certain degrees of his natural rights. The compromising of individual rights resulted in rights of “compact” or as our legislative laws were defined as “civil rights”.

Paine then reasoned that in Natural Rights we act wholly in our own person; in rights of compact or “Civil Rights” we agree not to do so, but act under the guarantee of society. It would then necessarily be argued that the more of the natural rights one surrendered, the more security one would possess.

In George Orwell’s prophetic 1984 the fictional country, Oceana, was under siege by internal and external powers threatening the security of the country. The people voluntarily surrendered their rights including the rights of movement and privacy in exchange for the protection afforded by the government – “Big Brother”

In 1936, physicist Max Planck wrote “An important scientific innovation rarely makes its way by winning over and converting its opponents. What happens is that its opponents gradually die out and that growing generation is familiarised with the idea from the beginning.”

In the twenty first century we are under siege by internal and external powers threatening the security of our country. We rush to embrace technology, video monitoring, and government intervention in the name of security. We voluntarily surrender rights for more security. Children at preschool are monitored by their mothers via internet video; streets, intersections, shopping malls, banks, post offices are “secured” by cameras. Technology has made it possible to track a person from conception to death. The generations born after the last twenty years think it is perfectly natural to be videoed all day, everyday. Accordingly it is becoming normal for police and soldiers to patrol our airports and to stop and question, perhaps arrest, someone “on mere suspicion”, or because the police happen to not like the persons color, dress, or birthplace. Will it become  “normal” for those arrested to be tried in a secret tribunal, disregarding the Bill of Rights?

Fifty years ago, soldiers did not patrol airports in Europe, except in Spain, under the dictatorship of Generalismo Francisco Franco. Yet now is it not only accepted; it is the model for the rest of the world.

The argument is made that once terrorism is eradicated, things will go back to normal. No chance! Terrorism will never be eradicated.

No one votes against security measures. Probably not even argue against them. All this security means one thing – crooks, criminals, crazies and terrorists have won! I like to think not. But I have told my children to remember what it was like before all the cameras and restrictions, because their own children will only know monitoring, personal identification tracking numbers, techno-physical confinement, loss of privacy and freedom of movement. Perhaps children will be induced to inform on parents, neighbor against neighbor, etc. (There is precedent).

The argument is made that once terrorism is eradicated, things will go back to normal. No chance! Terrorism will never be eradicated. It has always been here in one form or the next. It may go dormant for a few years, but it will recycle in a generation or two.

In the late 11th century, Muslim separatist Hasan ibn al-Sabbah, operated a terrorist training camp north of today’s Tehran. Terrorist activity (including assassination, kidnapping, bombing, lynching and hanging) has come down through the centuries. In the 1970’s terrorism was a real “hot button” subject- Skyjackings, planes blown up, kidnappings, bombs thrown into crowded market places, etc. The big names in those days were “Abul Nadal”, “Black September”, “The Jackal”, etc. Today it is Al Queda, ISIS, Boko Haram, Neo-Nazis, Right-Wing radical nationalistic militias, and others who have there own selfish beliefs about religion and racisim.  Who will it be in twenty years?

Yes, I sound like an alarmist. But, each year I see further erosion of the liberties and freedoms I took for granted. I support the fight against fear and terrorism but I am also a realist. Will we will win this current war. There is lots of doubt. Will freedom and security return to pre-modern alert status? Unlikely. Once a freedom is gone, it remains gone. Decisions are made in favor of security because without security there can be no freedom. But there can be security without freedom. It is possible to surrender one hundred percent of freedom but it is impossible to reach one hundred percent security.

There will always be those who will use any method, no matter how heinous, to foist their beliefs upon an unprepared public. Therefore,our security demands that once a security procedure, method, or operation is in place it will always remain so. We will never again have equal shares of freedom and security. It has become one or the other, not both.    

 


Freedom or Security?
By: Dale L. June

Dale June is a former U.S. Secret Service Agent assigned to the Presidential Protective Division at the White House plus serving in the Sacramento and San Diego field Offices and holds a Master’s Degree in Criminal Justice is from George Washington University. He currently teaches at National University, Los Angeles and is the author/co-author of nine books about protection and Homeland Security/Terrorism.

 

Buy The Latest Issue

Sign Up For News and Updates

We respect your privacy and will not share your information with anyone.
We will only message you when we have something relevant and of value to share with you.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest Issue

Circuit magazine cover issue 55

Issue 55

Buy Now

Latest Industry News

Industry News October 2020

We cast our eye over the main stories impacting the security industry. Here’s what’s appeared on the radar since the last issue.

Security industry News Brought to you by the Circuit Magazine

Industry News

We cast our eye over the main stories impacting the security industry, including, Kanye West’s former bodyguard is calling the rapper a “bully” and is threatening to sue for damages after West accused him of breaking a confidentiality agreement.

Industry News

We cast our eye over the main stories impacting the security industry. Here’s what’s appeared on the radar since the last issue.

Security industry News Brought to you by the Circuit Magazine

Security Industry Association Announces New SIA Women in Security Scholarship Opportunity

“The SIA Women in Security Forum works to grow and retain leaders in the security industry,” said Gloria Salmeron, director of human resources at Brivo and co-chair of the scholarship committee. “With the addition of this new scholarship, we look forward to helping bring opportunities for further education and advancement to as wide a spectrum of people as possible and inviting individuals to participate in the Women in Security Forum.”

Product Review earHero

Product Review – Ear Hero

Designed by an audiologist, earHero’s speakers are so tiny they will never block your ear canal giving you the ability to literally talk on a separate phone without removing the earHero tactical earpiece from either ear.

You can literally hear whisper level sounds from yards away, while identifying the sounds’ precise location. The earHero tactical headsets have wires so thin and clear, they are virtually undetectable, and the design is so comfortable, you’ll barely know the earpiece is there.

Introduction to Cybersecurity Part 4

Insecure Smart Houses

They are only of limited relevance today, but as the technologies involved become more widespread and implemented into every facet of life they will only become more prevalent. While it sounds like the stuff of science fiction, these threats exist now and are not going to go away.

For simplicity, we’ll say that a ‘smart’ device is anything which connects to the internet (or a network) and is not intended to be a computer interface. Intended is the key word there, as many of these devices are insecure for the simple reason that they are a computer. The problem is that it is now cheaper and easier to put a general purpose computer into a device and run some software to, for example, turn lights on and off than it is to design a single-purpose lightbulb which also connects to a network.

Behavioral Analysis

Turning Habitual Habits into a Positive

Being an instructor for Tony Scotti’s Vehicle Dynamics Institute has forwarded the opportunity to observe how a large section of professionals interact and function from different niches of the industry. Military, transnational EP teams, US based teams, Federal LEO’s or with civilians this theme shows through. Even in the larger training arena the change can be seen as more of the schools are starting to focus on classes or blocks of instruction such as client management and behavioral analysis. The discussion forms are flooded with conversations relating to how to work in a team dynamic. It doesn’t matter if its a 28 day school or a three day school, they will be touching on and teaching these topics.

Global Risk

Global Situation report provided by Stratfor

Global Situation Report October, 2020

Having informed insight in today’s increasingly complex international environment is more important than ever. That’s why we’ve partnered with Stratfor, the worlds leading geopolitical intelligence platform, to bring readers regular analysis and accurate forecasting of global trends from someone you can trust.

Popular Tags

Afghanistan armed attack Bodyguard Bodyguarding Celebrity client Close Protection Close Protection Officer Elijah Shaw Executive Executive Protection fight firearm gun Intelligence Iraq Law Enforcement Medical military News online police Prevention professional protect protection PTSD Risk Risk Assessment Risk Management Safety Security Security Incidents Security Industry Authority SIA Social Media Surveillance terror Terrorism terrorist Threat train Training VIP

On The Frontline

Making the Transition, Security Operator to Paramedic

We last heard from Jon back in 2013 as he was setting out on his quest to make the career jump from security management … >>>

Interview With: Elijah Shaw

Interview With: Elijah Shaw     Elijah Shaw is one of the USA’s top bodyguards. He has protected most of the biggest … >>>

A is for Appendix Carry

For those of us in protective services our goal is always risk mitigation verses risk management.  In fact in the … >>>

Follow us

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

From The Archives

EP For Green… When Will Our World’s Collide?

In June 1920, the United States Congress passed the 18th amendment, (the Volstead act) and the start of … >>>

Russia World Cup 2018 – Threat Analysis

The Russian Federation will host the 21st FIFA World Cup this summer between 14 June and 15 July. This highly … >>>

Tony Ansell Book Review

Book Review: The Professional Protection Officer

The Professional Protection Officer by Tony Ansell, MSyI (Dip) In North America the term ‘Protection Officer’ is applied … >>>

Suited for Duty

When it comes to a wardrobe fit for duty rule number one, you don’t buy it, you acquire it over time.  In most cases, … >>>

  • Terms And Conditions
  • Magazines
  • Privacy Policy
  • Archives

© 2021 Circuit Magazine · Rainmaker Platform

This website or its third-party tools use cookies which are necessary to its functioning and required to improve your experience. By clicking the consent button, you agree to allow the site to use, collect and/or store cookies.
I accept