Journalists Behaving Irresponsibly

Embed from Getty Images

Over the past few weeks, our TV screens have been filled with images of journalists behaving like irresponsible children foolishly “braving” the raw elements while a handful of very responsible ones reported from hard-cover and still managing to show the devastation behind them.

My problem with the former is that it sets the scene for future behaviour to create a competitiveness of who can be seen to be in the most danger.

You don’t ride a bike without a safety helmet, even though you know that the chances of falling off and getting hurt are minimal.

I can only imagine network bureaus having a manager glued to the multi-bank of screens to see if their competitors look more in danger than their own journos. “Look, awesome, she was blown across the street with trees falling down…get our team into a similar position!”

Seriously though, given the full event of a hurricane, and when you consider the “what next” scenarios that journalists SHOULD be prepared for…such as looting, rioting, and even shootouts, all of which are in addition to the already high possibility of death and destruction, then I would insist as a media manager or security adviser attached to teams, that my crews take ballistic helmets and body armour, a full med pack, individual trauma packs, and of course the ever-ready tourniquet, handy in a top or side pocket.

Embed from Getty Images

A hurricane is a hostile environment, yet I’ve seen so many examples of journalists behaving irresponsibly in extreme conditions. I’ve watched some close calls on live TV with the correspondent wearing nothing more than a thin rain jacket as protection from the elements…including the man-made flying debris. Where oh where is the common sense. Female correspondents pushed by their management into wearing makeup, would that be Kevlar makeup? Definitely nowhere close in the list of hostile environment priorities.

So, pressed into it by superiors sitting in their cozy bureaus or not…reporting from hard shelter/cover is the most responsible, professional and preferred option. If not, then get a ballistic helmet and set of body armour on, you’ll find this same attire useful for the previously mentioned possible after events.

Another useful piece of advice (again the same for war zones) is to have the minimum numbers on the ground at any time. Why have 4 or 5 people killed or injured when that particular task really only requires two? The cameraman is almost always required, but if you don’t require the correspondent, producer, sound man…then leave them back in safety. Don’t fall into the trap of individuals coming onto the ground simply because they’re bored…or require the excitement.

Usually, today journalists undergo hostile environment training (even if it’s a tick in the box to lower insurance costs). However, these are often condensed periods as many can’t afford the time or costs of longer courses. Therefore, the shorter courses concentrate on war zones/conflict areas. But there needs to be an appreciation for the importance of training and journalists should seek instruction on how to behave in hurricane’s/disaster areas too. Watching “green journalists” with nil training behind them behaving badly on the ground isn’t pretty to watch…for anyone.

Here is a short list of 6 items not usually carried into a hurricane by individual journalists that WILL be of use:

Ballistic helmet
body armour
medical/trauma pack (team and individual)
tourniquet
one piece waterproof body suit (to protect against the toxic filthy water when you’re asked to stand and wade in it)
sat phone – AT LEAST one per team should every other communication device fail.

Act responsibly…my neighbours are all laughing at the last few days behaviour during the news coverage, I’m not, I’m appalled…but I see a massive room for improvement in professionalism and safety!

Remember, for every “known” TV News personality behaving badly on camera, there will be ten young unknowns trying their hardest to emulate you…and we all know which one will end up getting hurt.

by: Bob Shepherd

Originally published on Bob Shepherds blog at: www.bobshepherdauthor.com

About Bob Shepherd

Bestselling author Bob Shepherd is a security advisor and 20-year veteran of Britain’s elite Special Air Service. With almost 20-years of private security work to his credit, he has successfully negotiated some of the most dangerous places on earth as both an SAS soldier and private citizen. Combined, Bob has spent almost 40 years operating in conflict areas. Bob is a regular media commentator on security issues and has appeared on CNN International, BBC, SKY News, Al Jazeera English, BBC Radio and various newspapers and magazines. He also shares his insights on security politics through his blog; www.bobshepherdauthor.com

The Conscientious Bodyguard

Given the nature of close protection and the conditions under which operators are expected to perform, it is imperative for those providing protective services to be highly developed, multi-disciplined individuals. However, beyond the obvious technical skills reqauired to execute well-drilled procedures, modern operators are expected to display more nuanced skills such as emotional intelligence, candour, judgement and resourcefulness to list but a few. So, how can understanding our personality type help us become better in our roles as close protection operatives? To answer this, we need to have a basic understanding of the factors influencing the various personality traits.

Stress and Self Care

Research by the American Psychological Association indicates that as many as 75-80 percent of Americans self-report their stress to be at moderate to high levels. Stress can come in many forms, and sometimes we may not even notice or seem bothered by it. So what constitutes stress? The normal daily routine of work or home responsibilities can cause stress, as can experiencing a sudden major life-altering event, such as losing a job, dealing with sudden loss, or a prolonged illness.

Church Security the New Frontier Part 3

I have many happy memories as a child going to church regularly being with my friends and family. One day however sticks out in my mind above all others. On this day, a man keeled over in the pew in front of me and the havoc that ensued is still clear in my memory… Emergency.

Since there are no guarantees that you will never be involved in an emergency, this article will help you to understand some of the things necessary to properly handle, or ideally help prevent, a crisis situation in a house of worship.

Countering Snipers Part 2

The first step in countering snipers is for everyone to be aware of the threat. This is where a threat assessment needs to be compiled and the realist threats need to be identified, if potential snipers are a threat then procedures need to be put in place.

In general, operational planning for a sniper threat should always be considered to some extent. Not only should counter sniper procedures be planned for but they need to be practiced, your people need to be trained at least in the basic reactions to fire and the use of cover, preferably before they are exposed to the sniper threat.

Insider Threat

The insider threat of crime to organisations is always present and can manifest itself in many ways. This has become more apparent because of the recent social-economic climate change within the UK.

Protecting Politicians

As recently as January of this year a man was jailed for a string of threating abuses against Mark Prisk, the MP for Hertford and Stortford. Perhaps the most worrying aspect of the story around this attack is that Prisk was so fearful that he failed to attending a hustings. He is not the only MP who has had to change his course of action due to threats. In February last year Diane Abbott, who was suffering cyber-attacks claimed she was fearful of walking the streets of her own constituency.

Journalists Behaving Irresponsibly

Buy The Latest Issue

Sign Up For News and Updates

About Bob Shepherd

Leave a Reply Cancel reply